SPECS · PICS · REVIEWS · RATING
SPECS · PICS · RATING
|
80 MuZ TS 250-1 discussion forum:MuZ 250/1 Supa 5 - Super!! |
| MuZ 250/1 Supa 5 - Super!! |
| NN said 2003-03-28 00:10 |
| I owned one of these machines for about 5 years in the eighties. I ´graduated´ to it from a Honda CD175, which whilst a fairly decent commuter bike, was hampered by being chain driven, fully enclosed and a real pig to adjust. Removing the rear wheel was a big job, and was rarely accomplished in less than 1 and a half hours, wheel out to wheel back in. So, I was less than convinced about getting another chain driven bike. What a revelation the MZ was! In all the time I had it, I only needed to adjust the chain four times, and rear wheeel removal was a real breeze, thanks to qd assembly and cush drive. Handling was good, once gotten used to, and though theoretical top speed wasn´t much, at about 80mph, it would do this up hill and down dale, often ´blowing off´ Honda Superdreams on motorway inclines. Sure, there were ´glitches´ but nothing tremendously big, and eminently forgivable on a bike costing so little. I had a front brake conversion on mine, so i never experienced the classic ´brake lag´ of the o/e equipment! The Honda TLS front drum brake fitted to my bike was more than adequate, and initially too much at low town speeds! (it just stopped - and I fell off!) Initially, I found the off-road pedigree of the marque a little terrifiying. The tendency for the front end to leave the ground when accelerating (especially two-up) took some getting used to. However, the good spread of torque was useful in the area of rural Wales where I then lived, as was the economy of running the thing at ´sensible´ speeds. The bike was a bit Jekyll and Hyde in that at speeds of 50mph or less the economy returned was in excess of 110 mpg, but if top speed was used, I was lucky to get 30 mpg! I spent a little time ´blueprinting´ my bike, and got some useful increase in performance, especially on acceleration. At lower speeds the bike wasn´t particularly happy, the combibnation of steep sterring geometry (undamped) and the original o/e carburetor made for somewhat jerky progress. However, once speed increased beyond 10mph, things smoothed out fine. All in all, a good all round bike very much worthy of the enthusiasm of their owners in general. |
| <<Previous Answer Discussion overview Report spam Next>> |
You can post your question, answer or comment as a guest. Or
enter your e-mail to join the forum and get notifcations of new messages.
|
Enter a comment or answer to this message|
|
More 1980 MuZ TS 250-1 informationOur discussion forums are intended for short messages. We also welcome more extensive motorcycle reviews.Bikez also recommends that you check out the technical data and the riders' rating for the 80 MuZ TS 250-1. You can also rate it yourself. Use our efficient motorcycle classifieds to sell or buy this bike. Your motorbike gets a high quality presentation. Ads are free. |